Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) – Measurement-Based understanding of the aeRosol budget in the Arctic and its Climate Effects (MBRACE)
The video is also accessible here: https://tube.switch.ch/videos/fahrMcaqXw
For meta data scroll to the bottom of the page.
Duration of projects:
Swiss National Science Foundation: MBRACE December 2019 – December 2022
US Department of Energy: Closing the Gap August 2021 – July 2024
J. Schmale, A. Baccarini, Progress in unraveling atmospheric new particle formation and growth across the Arctic. Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL094198, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094198
Schmale, J., Zieger, P. & Ekman, A.M.L. Aerosols in current and future Arctic climate. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 95–105 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00969-5
Scope of Projects
From September 2019 to October 2020 the icebreaker Polarstern of the Alfred Wegener Institute drifted through the Arctic Ocean as platform to facilitate interdisciplinary studies of the Arctic climate system. The mission is called “Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate” – MOSAiC. At the center of scientific activities are investigations of the sea ice, ocean, atmosphere, ecosystem and biogeochemistry.
The contribution of our project SNF MBRACE, which stands for “Measurement-Based understanding of the aeRosol budget in the Arctic and its Climate Effects”, aims to improve our understanding of how natural and anthropogenic particulate matter and trace gases contribute to cloud formation in the Arctic. Clouds are an important element in the surface energy balance of the high Arctic and have a net warming effect.
The US DOE project “Closing the gap on understudied aerosol-climate processes in the rapidly changing central Arctic” builds on the same field observations with a focus on anthropogenic Arctic air pollution by ships, coarse mode aerosols including ice nucleating particles and sea spray, and fog formation.
Low-level clouds have an important effect on the surface energy budget in the Arctic. Their lifecycles and warming and cooling effects over the central Arctic Ocean remain unclear, and models fail to correctly simulate them. This shortcoming is partly due to insufficient information on cloud phase (liquid and/or ice crystals). Particularly liquid droplets modulate cloud radiative properties responsible for warming. Droplets form on cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), a subset of aerosol particles. Aerosol particle concentrations over the central Arctic Ocean can be extremely low such that cloud properties are strongly influenced by CCN availability, and in extreme cases cloud formation is even inhibited. Information on aerosol is scarce for all seasons in the high Arctic, but in particular for the cold and dark period when clouds have a pronounced warming effect. To date, only information from land-based stations further south provide proxy information on central Arctic Ocean aerosols in winter.
We will use the unique field experiment Multidisciplinary Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) to elucidate sources and properties of aerosols in the central Arctic Ocean and their interactions with clouds. We run a laboratory container with state-of-the-art aerosol instrumentation, including high-resolution mass spectrometers, to study new particle formation (NPF, see project on “Formation of secondary nano-sized aerosol particles from atmospheric trace gases and ions in the polar marine environment” by T. Jokinen and M. Sipilä, University of Helsinki), particle growth, the chemical composition of the particles, and activation of particles to cloud droplets. We operate the instrumentation behind a total inlet that captures particles and droplets, and an interstitial inlet which captures only particles that are unable to form cloud droplets.
Our contribution will be central to understanding the radiative effects of clouds in the Arctic and their natural and anthropogenic drivers.
Specific Research Questions
Our guiding research questions are as follows:
- What are the contributions of natural versus anthropogenic sources to central Arctic Ocean CCN concentrations and how do they vary throughout the seasons (e.g. full sea ice cover in winter vs marginal ice zone in summer)?
- How important growth of newly formed particles for the CCN budget?
- Which key natural processes are likely to change the CCN budget and control cloud properties with global warming (e.g., diminishing sea ice)?
- How strongly are liquid cloud radiative properties controlled by availability of CCN throughout the seasons?
- What are natural sources of aerosol in general and CCN in particular during polar night?
- What is the impact of local anthropogenic ship emission in the Arctic?
- What are the sources of coarse mode aerosol and how do they contribute to ice nucleating particle budget?
- How does summertime Arctic fog formation transform the aerosol population?
With our dataset, we will shed light on the contribution of anthropogenic emissions that are not greenhouse gases to Arctic warming through cloud formation, characterize for the first time aerosol-cloud interactions during Arctic winter, and help to evaluate and improve models for better predictions of Arctic climate change and its far-reaching consequences.
Basic results include:
- high-resolution time series of total particle number concentration, particle number size distribution (15 nm – 19 µm), cloud condensation nuclei number concentration at various supersaturations, aerosol chemical composition including equivalent black carbon, sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, organics, methanesulfonic acid (MSA) and chloride, fluorescent particle number concentration amongst other,
- Difference between number concentrations, size distribution and chemical composition of the particles that are able to activate as cloud droplets and those that are not,
- Time series of trace gases such as CO2, CH4, O3, CO and SO2
More specific expected results are:
- Determination of the peak supersaturation of clouds and the ability of particles to activate as cloud droplets (from the total and interstitial inlets)
- Source apportionment of the aerosol population as a whole and of the CCN population specifically, e.g. anthropogenic origin, marine secondary organic aerosol (MSA), marine primary aerosol (sea salt, organics)
- Contribution of special events to the aerosol population and their importance for the overall particle budget, e.g. opening of a lead, snow storms, phytoplankton blooms
- Seasonal variations of various aerosol characteristics
- Contribution of biogenic fluorescent particles
- Potentially an estimation of how much the exhaust from Polarstern influence cloud droplet number concentrations
Measurements and Instruments
Our approach is to «sit and watch» for the duration of the expedition. We deployed our measurement container on the bow of Polarstern and operate a total, an interstitial and a new particle formation inlet to study particles from their birth to their activation in cloud droplets. Below tables provides and overview of our instrumentation and measured parameters.
Team & Partners
INAR: Lauriane Quelévér, Tiia Laurila, Tuija Jokinen, Zoe Brasseur, Mikko Sipilä
Colorado State University: Jessie Cremean
University of Michigan: Kerri Prat
Video meta data:
Meta data for MOSAiC leg 3 panorama camera sea ice timelapse
contact: [email protected]
More information about MOSAiC: https://mosaic-expedition.org/
Camera was mounted on RV Polarstern, images were taken every 20 minutes at ISO-800, 3.94 sec exposure at a focal length of 35 mm with a Livecam Gen 3 camera.
Software: image acquisition with DigitalLive V1.31a; timelapse generation with Irfan view V4.54
Owner of the camera: Alfred Wegener Institute
The timelapse includes images from 24.02.2020 00:00 to 16.05.2020 23:59 UTC