Electroacoustic resonators

Electroacoustic absorbers are used to damp room modes at low frequencies. Here the laboratory prototype of the Acoustic Group, side by side with the AVAA C20 model of PSI Audio.

Introduction

Loudspeakers are well known as sound sources, being the only means to render music and movie sounds in your living room for example. But they can also be used as membrane absorbers, capable to damp sound energy in the low frequency range, where no state-of-the-art soundproofing material can actually work.

How it works

The baseline electroacoustic resonator configuration consists of a loudspeaker enclosed in an air-filled cabinet, a microphone mounted on the front side of the cabinet to estimate the sound pressure applied on the diaphragm, the whole being connected by a control hardware, consisting of a digital signal processing unit (DSP, u-controller, FPGA, etc.) and a power amplifier (preferably a current-driven amplifier).

Schematics of the baseline Electroacoustic resonator

The microphone senses the pressure applied over the loudspeaker membrane, likely to make it vibrate, and feeds the digital signal processing unit. This, in turn, drives the loudspeaker’s electrical terminals in the form of a current, in order to create an opposite force that moves it according to a target response. For example, if we want to absorb the sound energy coming from the incident sound field, we need to impose the membrane vibration velocity be in phase with sound pressure, with a given amplitude. If the ratio between sound pressure and membrane velocity is equal to the so-called characteristic acoustic impedance of the air, the membrane becomes ideally absorbent to sound.

This control strategy is interesting in terms of noise reduction as it is effective particularly at low frequencies (in the range of a few tens of Hertz) where conventional sound absorbing materials are known to be ineffective. This makes the concept particularly attractive, for example, to damp the low-frequency resonances occurring in rooms dedicated to music reproduction (eg. sound recording studios).

You can find some videos illustrating the problem of room modes at low frequencies, and how Electroacoustic Resonators can damp those.

What are the applications

Besides room modes damping at low-frequency, the same concept can be adapted to other frequency ranges by scaling the components (especially the loudspeaker). Although conventional passive materials, such as glass wool (porous materials) or perforated panels (Helmholtz resonators), can be more interesting cost-wise, the electroacoustic resonators’ main asset lies in the capacity to adapt to the frequency of the noise. Also, their small size relative to the acoustic wavelength (of the order of 1 m at 500 Hz) makes it an extraordinary asset for noise reduction in environments where size matters.

This is especially the case of aircraft engine noise reduction, where the engine noise comprises a certain number of tonal frequencies (associated to the fan rotation speed), that vary with time and are not addressable with a single acoustic treatment (called acoustic liners in the aircraft industry). With the electroacoustic resonator concept, we have been able to develop a new concept of Active electroacoustic liner in the frame of the H2020-SALUTE project, capable to reduce noise by about 5 dB of individual tonal noises ranging over one frequency octave for different rotation speeds, up to 4 dB on broadband noise, and more impressively up to 25 dB on the low-frequency buzz-saw noise, surpassing any existing passive treatment.

Fan et nacelle d’un moteur General Electric CF-6 d’Airbus A300. L’intĂ©rieur de la nacelle est microperforĂ©e pour rĂ©duire l’intensitĂ© du bruit.
Electroacoustic Resonator photo (a) and sketch of the nacelle inlet without front wiremesh and perforated plate (b).

What we are working on

Besides room acoustics and aircraft engine noise reduction applications, the Electroacoustic Resonator concept’s unique performance is a perfect fit for noise reduction and sound control in the low- to middle-frequency range. Examples of applications we are investigating are ventilation and HVAC systems, in-ear hearing devices (hearing aids among others), improvement of partitions and screens in open space offices, etc.

Some of our other work is also applying Electroacoustic Resonators as unit-cells for Active Acoustic Metamaterials.

We have likewise moved to applying the same control strategy to a new kind of electroacoustic transducer, the Corona Discharge Transducer, which extends the performance in terms of frequency bandwidth.

List of projects associated with this topic

Funding body

Project

Period

SNSF

Smart Panels with Variable Acoustic Properties (SPA)

2008-2012

FP7

OPtimisation for low Environmental Noise impact AIRcarft (OPENAIR)

2009-2014

KTI/CTI

Intelligent low-frequeNcy acousTic Equalization of Rooms using Active ConTrol Subwoofers (INTERACTS)

2012-2016

FP7

Engine Module Validators (ENOVAL)

2014-2016

H2020

Smart Acoustic Lining for UHBR Technologies Engines (SALUTE)

2018-2022

SNSF

Active Nonlinear Acoustic METAsurfaces

2021-2025

 

To learn more:

2025

The Advection Boundary Law in presence of mean flow and plane wave excitation: Passivity, nonreciprocity and enhanced noise transmission attenuation

E. De Bono; M. Collet; M. Ouisse; E. Salze; M. Volery et al. 

Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2025. Vol. 618, num. Part A. DOI : 10.1016/j.jsv.2025.119293.

Experimental assessment of a programmable Electroacoustic Liner in a representative turbofan facility

E. De Bono; E. Salze; M. Collet; M. Gillet; M. Ouisse et al. 

Applied Acoustics. 2025. Vol. 240, num. 5, p. 110896. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2025.110896.

Active control of electroacoustic resonators in the audible regime: control strategies and airborne applications

M. MallĂ©jac; M. Volery; H. Lissek; R. Fleury 

npj Acoustics. 2025. Vol. 1, num. 1. DOI : 10.1038/s44384-025-00006-9.

Observation of amplitude-driven nonreciprocity for energy guiding

M. F. Padlewski; R. Fleury; H. Lissek 

Physical Review B. 2025. Vol. 111, num. 12. DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.125156.

2023

Active Acoustic Su-Schrieffer-Heeger-Like Metamaterial

M. F. Padlewski; M. Volery; R. Fleury; H. Lissek; X. Guo 

Physical Review Applied. 2023. Vol. 20, p. 014022. DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.014022.

Observation of non-reciprocal harmonic conversion in real sounds

X. Guo; H. Lissek; R. Fleury 

Communications Physics. 2023. Vol. 6, num. 93, p. 1 – 6. DOI : 10.1038/s42005-023-01217-w.

Robust direct acoustic impedance control using two microphones for mixed feedforward-feedback controller

M. Volery; X. Guo; H. Lissek 

Acta Acustica. 2023. Vol. 7, p. 2. DOI : 10.1051/aacus/2022058.

2022

Effect of time delay on the impedance control of a pressure-based, current-driven Electroacoustic Absorber

E. De Bono; M. Collet; G. Matten; S. Karkar; H. Lissek et al. 

Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2022. Vol. 537, p. 117201. DOI : 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.117201.

In flow acoustic characterisation of a 2D active liner with local and non local strategies.

K. Billon; E. D. Bono; M. Perez; E. Salze; G. Matten et al. 

Applied Acoustics. 2022. Vol. 191, p. 108655. DOI : 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108655.

PID-like active impedance control for electroacoustic resonators to design tunable single-degree-of-freedom sound absorbers

X. Guo; M. Volery; H. Lissek 

Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2022. Vol. 525, p. 116784. DOI : 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.116784.

2020

Low frequency sound field reconstruction in a non-rectangular room using a small number of microphones

T. Pham Vu; H. Lissek 

Acta Acustica. 2020. Vol. 4, num. 2, p. 5. DOI : 10.1051/aacus/2020006.

Improving sound absorption through nonlinear active electroacoustic resonators

X. Guo; R. Fleury; H. Lissek 

Physical Review Applied. 2020. Vol. 13, p. 014018. DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.014018.

2019

Active acoustic resonators with reconfigurable resonance frequency, absorption, and bandwidth

T. Koutserimpas; E. Rivet; H. Lissek; R. Fleury 

Physical Review Applied. 2019. Vol. 12, num. 5, p. 054064. DOI : 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.054064.

2018

Duct modes damping through an adjustable electroacoustic liner under grazing incidence

R. Boulandet; H. Lissek; S. Karkar; M. Collet; G. Matten et al. 

Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2018. Vol. 426, p. 19 – 33. DOI : 10.1016/j.jsv.2018.04.009.

Toward Wideband Steerable Acoustic Metasurfaces with Arrays of Active Electroacoustic Resonators

H. Lissek; E. Rivet; T. Laurence; R. Fleury 

Journal of Applied Physics. 2018. Vol. 123, num. 9, p. 091714. DOI : 10.1063/1.5011380.

Multi-degree-of-freedom low-frequency electroacoustic absorbers through coupled resonators

E. Rivet; S. Karkar; H. Lissek 

Applied Acoustics. 2018. Vol. 132, p. 109 – 117. DOI : 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.10.019.

2017

On the Optimisation of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Acoustic Impedances of Low-Frequency Electroacoustic Absorbers for Room Modal Equalisation

E. Rivet; S. Karkar; H. Lissek 

Acta Acustica united with Acustica. 2017. Vol. 103, num. 6, p. 1025 – 1036. DOI : 10.3813/AAA.919132.

Broadband Low-Frequency Electroacoustic Absorbers Through Hybrid Sensor-/Shunt-Based Impedance Control

E. Rivet; S. Karkar; H. Lissek 

IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology. 2017. Vol. 25, num. 1, p. 63 – 72. DOI : 10.1109/TCST.2016.2547981.

2016

Sensorless Electroacoustic Absorbers Through Synthesized Impedance Control for Damping Low-Frequency Modes in Cavities

R. Boulandet; E. Rivet; H. Lissek 

Acta Acustica united with Acustica. 2016. Vol. 102, num. 4, p. 696 – 704. DOI : 10.3813/AAA.918986.

2014

Toward broadband electroacoustic resonators through optimized feedback control strategies

R. Boulandet; H. Lissek 

Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2014. Vol. 333, num. 20, p. 4810 – 4825. DOI : 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.05.033.